Competition Type

Competed Under SAP in Federal Contracting

Federal contract awards competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures, including obligations, agencies, vendors, and yearly trends.

Competition Type Extent Code: F COMPETED UNDER SAP

Updated 03/21/2026

Total Obligations
$264.08B
Award Count
13,794,645
Avg Award Size
$19.14K
Share of Total
1.00%

Analysis

This page summarizes FPDS Query results for Competed Under SAP Federal Contracts. It shows how much federal contract value falls into this procurement pattern, how many awards match the filter, and which agencies and vendors account for the largest share of obligations in the current result set.

The available trend series runs from FY 1996 to FY 2026. This makes it possible to evaluate whether the pattern is stable across time, expanding, declining, or concentrated in specific fiscal periods.

Top Agency
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
$64.81B
Top Vendor
SUNSHINE MINTING, INC.
$6.23B
Page Type
Competition Type
Coverage Window
FY 1996–2026

Reference

Extent Competed Code
F
Extent Competed Label
COMPETED UNDER SAP

Summary Query Logic

The headline metrics on this page come from dedicated KPI and share-of-total query blocks. These precomputed queries define the numeric baseline for the rest of the analysis.

Query Used — Summary Metrics

SELECT
     sum(content__award__dollarValues__obligatedAmount) AS total_obligated,
    count() AS award_count,
    sum(content__award__dollarValues__obligatedAmount) / nullIf(count(),
    0) AS avg_award_size 
FROM
     fpds.data 
WHERE
     contract_type = 1
    AND content__award__competition__extentCompeted = 'F'
    AND content__award__relevantContractDates__signedDate != ''

Explanation

This query aggregates federal contract awards that were competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) and fully competed, as indicated by the contract type and competition extent filters. It calculates the total obligated amount, the count of awards, and the average award size for contracts with valid signed dates. The resulting output row summarizes these core metrics, representing the overall scale and frequency of competed SAP awards within the dataset. Analysts should interpret these figures as key performance indicators reflecting the volume and financial magnitude of fully competed SAP contracts, which typically involve streamlined procurement processes for smaller purchases. This section supports decisions related to evaluating competition levels under SAP, assessing market participation, and identifying trends in contract award sizes. Follow-up questions may include exploring agency-specific obligations, vendor concentration, or year-over-year changes in competed SAP awards to inform procurement strategy or policy adjustments.

Query Used — Share of Total Spending

SELECT
     sumIf(content__award__dollarValues__obligatedAmount,
    content__award__competition__extentCompeted = 'F') AS filtered_obligated,
    sum(content__award__dollarValues__obligatedAmount) AS total_obligated,
    filtered_obligated / total_obligated * 100 AS share_percent 
FROM
     fpds.data 
WHERE
     contract_type = 1
    AND content__award__relevantContractDates__signedDate != ''

Explanation

This query aggregates total federal contract obligations for contracts awarded under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) that were fully competed, identified by the competition extent marked as 'F'. It calculates the sum of obligated amounts specifically for these competed SAP contracts and compares it to the total obligations across all contract types with valid signed dates, producing a share percentage. Each result row quantifies the dollar value of competed SAP contract obligations, the overall federal contract obligations, and the proportion that competed SAP contracts represent within the total federal contracting spend. Analysts should interpret this section as a measure of how much federal spending under SAP is subject to full competition, providing insight into competition levels in simplified acquisitions. This information supports decisions related to market competitiveness, vendor engagement strategies, and policy evaluation on the use of SAP, prompting follow-up questions about trends over time, agency-specific competition rates, or the impact on contract performance and pricing.

Trend Over Time

This section tracks how obligations and award counts move across fiscal years for the current competition or reason-not-competed filter.

Query Used

SELECT
     if(toUInt8(substring(content__award__relevantContractDates__signedDate,
    6,
    2)) >= 10,
    toUInt16(substring(content__award__relevantContractDates__signedDate,
    1,
    4)) + 1,
    toUInt16(substring(content__award__relevantContractDates__signedDate,
    1,
    4))) AS fiscal_year,
    sum(content__award__dollarValues__obligatedAmount) AS total_obligated,
    count() AS award_count 
FROM
     fpds.data 
WHERE
     contract_type = 1
    AND content__award__competition__extentCompeted = 'F'
    AND content__award__relevantContractDates__signedDate != '' 
GROUP BY
     fiscal_year 
ORDER BY
     fiscal_year ASC

Explanation

This query aggregates federal contract awards competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) by fiscal year, filtering specifically for full and open competition within SAP contracts. Each row in the output table represents a single fiscal year, showing the total obligated dollar amount and the count of awards issued under these competed SAP contracts during that year. Analysts can interpret this trend data to understand how competition under SAP has evolved over time, including fluctuations in contract volume and spending levels. This temporal view supports market researchers and contractors in identifying periods of increased competitive activity or shifts in agency procurement strategies under SAP. The section also aids decision-makers in assessing the overall market size and competition intensity within SAP contracts, guiding strategic planning, resource allocation, and further inquiry into factors driving year-to-year changes.

Fiscal Year Total Obligated Award Count
1996 $590.90 1
1997 $18.23K 2
1998 $142.68K 16
1999 $4.07M 36
2000 $3.47M 161
2001 $7.48M 220
2002 $14.87M 284
2003 $270.46M 765
2004 $506.72M 8,139
2005 $1.36B 81,586
2006 $2.02B 294,275
2007 $1.30B 284,180
2008 $1.74B 287,949
2009 $2.64B 279,755
2010 $7.31B 447,041
2011 $10.94B 562,303
2012 $11.04B 577,204
2013 $12.83B 523,837
2014 $13.60B 559,483
2015 $14.47B 802,775
2016 $14.98B 897,319
2017 $15.20B 925,038
2018 $17.56B 937,727
2019 $18.21B 919,827
2020 $17.90B 881,698
2021 $17.01B 856,374
2022 $17.55B 857,193
2023 $19.66B 880,291
2024 $20.54B 863,680
2025 $20.64B 865,518
2026 $4.78B 199,968

Top Agencies

This section ranks federal agencies by total obligations under the current page filter.

Query Used

SELECT
     content__award__purchaserInformation__contractingOfficeAgencyID AS agency_id,
    anyHeavy(content__award__purchaserInformation__contractingOfficeAgencyID__name) AS agency_name,
    sum(content__award__dollarValues__obligatedAmount) AS total_obligated,
    count() AS award_count 
FROM
     fpds.data 
WHERE
     contract_type = 1
    AND content__award__competition__extentCompeted = 'F'
    AND content__award__relevantContractDates__signedDate != '' 
GROUP BY
     agency_id 
ORDER BY
     total_obligated DESC 
LIMIT  10

Explanation

This query aggregates federal contract awards competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) with full and open competition, grouping results by contracting agency. Each row in the output table represents a single agency’s total obligated amount and the count of awards meeting these criteria, reflecting the agency’s volume and scale of competed SAP contracts. Analysts should interpret the data as an indicator of which agencies are most active in awarding competed SAP contracts, highlighting their procurement priorities and market engagement under this streamlined process. This section supports decisions related to identifying key federal buyers for competed SAP contracts, assessing agency competition levels, and targeting market research or business development efforts accordingly. Follow-up questions may include examining trends over time, award size distributions, or vendor concentration within these top agencies.

# Agency ID Agency Name Total Obligated Award Count
1 97AS DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY $64.81B 6,148,556
2 2100 DEPT OF THE ARMY $32.12B 712,636
3 3600 VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF $20.35B 458,955
4 1700 DEPT OF THE NAVY $19.57B 536,665
5 5700 DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE $14.88B 259,032
6 1900 STATE, DEPARTMENT OF $12.58B 537,456
7 2044 UNITED STATES MINT $9.09B 12,820
8 12C2 FOREST SERVICE $7.85B 270,104
9 6920 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION $6.75B 41,755
10 1540 FEDERAL PRISON SYSTEM $6.15B 396,530

Top Vendors

This section ranks contractors by total obligations under the current page filter.

Query Used

SELECT
     content__award__vendor__vendorHeader__vendorName AS vendor_name,
    sum(content__award__dollarValues__obligatedAmount) AS total_obligated,
    count() AS award_count 
FROM
     fpds.data 
WHERE
     contract_type = 1
    AND content__award__competition__extentCompeted = 'F'
    AND content__award__relevantContractDates__signedDate != ''
    AND content__award__vendor__vendorHeader__vendorName IS NOT NULL
    AND content__award__vendor__vendorHeader__vendorName != '' 
GROUP BY
     vendor_name 
ORDER BY
     total_obligated DESC 
LIMIT  10

Explanation

This query aggregates federal contract awards competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) with full and open competition, filtering for valid signed dates and non-null vendor names. Each row in the output table represents a unique vendor, showing the total obligated amount and the count of awards they received under these criteria. Analysts can interpret this section as a ranking of the top vendors by total federal obligations awarded through fully competed SAP contracts, providing insight into which contractors dominate this segment of the federal marketplace. This data supports market research by identifying key players and their contract volume, enabling comparisons of vendor performance and market share within SAP competitions. Follow-up analysis might include examining agency distribution, contract types, or temporal trends to understand how these vendors secure awards and to identify potential opportunities or risks in procurement strategies.

# Vendor Name Total Obligated Award Count
1 SUNSHINE MINTING, INC. $6.23B 489
2 MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES $4.63B 309,682
3 MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN CONTRACTORS $3.27B 111,369
4 STERN/LEACH COMPANY $1.63B 161
5 T-REX CONSULTING CORPORATION $1.51B 143
6 DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) $880.56M 60,862
7 KAMPI COMPONENTS CO., INC. $841.73M 91,574
8 ATLANTIC DIVING SUPPLY, INC. $808.84M 28,915
9 FOREIGN AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) $794.72M 9,019
10 TRIMAN INDUSTRIES INC $767.69M 34,323

Raw KPI Values

Raw Total Obligated
$264,078,680,898.71
Raw Award Count
13,794,645
Raw Avg Award Size
$19,143.56
Raw Share Percent
1.00%

Overall Conclusion

Federal contracts competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) represent a substantial market segment with total obligations exceeding $264 billion across nearly 13.8 million awards, reflecting an average award size of approximately $19,000. Despite accounting for only 1% of overall federal contracting dollars, the volume of transactions indicates a high-frequency, low-dollar-value spending pattern characteristic of SAP. The data reveals significant concentration among a few agencies, with the Defense Logistics Agency obligating nearly $65 billion and the Department of the Army contributing over $32 billion, together comprising a majority share of SAP obligations. Vendor concentration is less pronounced, although a handful of entities such as Sunshine Minting, Inc. and various foreign awardees command multi-billion-dollar totals, suggesting both domestic and international participation. Temporal trends show a rapid growth in SAP obligations from the late 1990s into the early 2000s, indicating increasing reliance on simplified procedures over time. For analysts, this page underscores the importance of examining high-volume, low-value contract activity to understand federal procurement dynamics beyond large-dollar awards. Contractors can identify opportunities in agencies with the highest SAP spending, while procurement researchers may leverage this data to assess competition intensity and market accessibility within simplified acquisition channels. Overall, SAP contracts constitute a critical, though financially smaller, component of federal procurement that merits focused analysis due to its scale and agency concentration.

Method Notes

This page is generated from a stored FPDS Query payload. The values shown here come from precomputed query blocks for KPI, share, yearly trend, top agencies, and top vendors.

Each analytical section can include the underlying query used together with an AI-generated explanation of what the result set represents and how it should be interpreted.

Use this page as a starting point for market structure review, then continue into deeper filtering and custom SQL in FPDS Query.

Use FPDS Query for deeper analysis

Move from this published page into full contract research with direct SQL access, broader filters, saved queries, and deeper procurement analysis across agencies, vendors, NAICS, PSC, and time windows.