Competition Type

Not Competed Under SAP in Federal Contracting

Federal contract awards categorized as not competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), including obligations, agencies, vendors, and yearly trends.

Competition Type Extent Code: G NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Updated 03/21/2026

Total Obligations
$113.50B
Award Count
5,322,300
Avg Award Size
$21.33K
Share of Total
0.00%

Analysis

This page summarizes FPDS Query results for Not Competed Under SAP Federal Contracts. It shows how much federal contract value falls into this procurement pattern, how many awards match the filter, and which agencies and vendors account for the largest share of obligations in the current result set.

The available trend series runs from FY 1986 to FY 2026. This makes it possible to evaluate whether the pattern is stable across time, expanding, declining, or concentrated in specific fiscal periods.

Top Agency
DEPT OF THE ARMY
$14.22B
Top Vendor
FREDERICK SAIC INC
$1.98B
Page Type
Competition Type
Coverage Window
FY 1986–2026

Reference

Extent Competed Code
G
Extent Competed Label
NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Summary Query Logic

The headline metrics on this page come from dedicated KPI and share-of-total query blocks. These precomputed queries define the numeric baseline for the rest of the analysis.

Query Used — Summary Metrics

SELECT
     sum(content__award__dollarValues__obligatedAmount) AS total_obligated,
    count() AS award_count,
    sum(content__award__dollarValues__obligatedAmount) / nullIf(count(),
    0) AS avg_award_size 
FROM
     fpds.data 
WHERE
     contract_type = 1
    AND content__award__competition__extentCompeted = 'G'
    AND content__award__relevantContractDates__signedDate != ''

Explanation

This query aggregates federal contract awards classified as not competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) by summing the total obligated amounts and counting the number of awards where the contract type indicates SAP and the extent of competition is marked as "G" (not competed). The resulting output table presents three key metrics: the total obligated dollars, the total count of awards, and the average award size calculated by dividing total obligations by award count. Each row represents a consolidated summary of all such SAP contracts within the specified timeframe, reflecting the overall scale and frequency of non-competitive awards. Analysts should interpret these summary metrics as core indicators of the volume and financial magnitude of federal procurements awarded without competition under SAP. This section supports decisions related to assessing market competition, identifying potential areas for increased competition, and monitoring agency compliance with procurement regulations. Follow-up questions may include examining trends over time, agency-specific breakdowns, or vendor concentration within these non-competitive SAP awards.

Query Used — Share of Total Spending

SELECT
     sumIf(content__award__dollarValues__obligatedAmount,
    content__award__competition__extentCompeted = 'G') AS filtered_obligated,
    sum(content__award__dollarValues__obligatedAmount) AS total_obligated,
    filtered_obligated / total_obligated * 100 AS share_percent 
FROM
     fpds.data 
WHERE
     contract_type = 1
    AND content__award__relevantContractDates__signedDate != ''

Explanation

This query aggregates total obligated amounts for federal contracts awarded under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) that were not competed, identified by the competition extent labeled as 'G'. It compares these filtered obligations against the total obligations for all federal contracts of type 1, representing standard procurement contracts, within the specified date range. Each result row quantifies the dollar value of non-competed SAP awards, the overall contract spending, and the percentage share that non-competed SAP awards represent of total obligations. Analysts should interpret this section as a measure of how much federal spending bypasses competitive processes under SAP, providing insight into procurement efficiency and risk exposure. This information supports decisions related to policy evaluation, compliance monitoring, and identifying areas where competition could potentially be increased to enhance transparency and value. Follow-up questions might include examining agency-level variations, vendor concentration, or trends over time to better understand the drivers behind non-competitive SAP awards.

Trend Over Time

This section tracks how obligations and award counts move across fiscal years for the current competition or reason-not-competed filter.

Query Used

SELECT
     if(toUInt8(substring(content__award__relevantContractDates__signedDate,
    6,
    2)) >= 10,
    toUInt16(substring(content__award__relevantContractDates__signedDate,
    1,
    4)) + 1,
    toUInt16(substring(content__award__relevantContractDates__signedDate,
    1,
    4))) AS fiscal_year,
    sum(content__award__dollarValues__obligatedAmount) AS total_obligated,
    count() AS award_count 
FROM
     fpds.data 
WHERE
     contract_type = 1
    AND content__award__competition__extentCompeted = 'G'
    AND content__award__relevantContractDates__signedDate != '' 
GROUP BY
     fiscal_year 
ORDER BY
     fiscal_year ASC

Explanation

This query aggregates federal contract awards that were not competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) by fiscal year, summing the total obligated amounts and counting the number of awards each year. Each row in the output table represents a single fiscal year, showing the cumulative dollar value obligated to these non-competed SAP contracts alongside the total number of such awards issued during that period. Analysts should read this table as a longitudinal view of federal spending and award volume where competition was waived under SAP, enabling identification of trends in procurement activity over time. This section supports analytical efforts to assess how reliance on non-competitive SAP contracts has evolved, informing decisions about market competition, risk management, and policy compliance. Follow-up questions might include investigating the agencies driving these trends, vendor concentration, or the impact on contract pricing and performance.

Fiscal Year Total Obligated Award Count
1986 $10.38K 1
1993 $15.00K 1
1994 $828.77K 2
1995 $4.01M 4
1996 $3.54M 29
1997 $3.91M 6
1998 $4.81M 9
1999 $14.92M 31
2000 $6.07M 95
2001 $200.87M 169
2002 $319.85M 387
2003 $486.22M 1,500
2004 $1.34B 39,780
2005 $1.49B 60,302
2006 $1.36B 292,350
2007 $1.41B 646,302
2008 $1.70B 822,592
2009 $1.28B 144,334
2010 $3.52B 176,139
2011 $4.34B 206,228
2012 $3.73B 188,882
2013 $4.19B 175,699
2014 $5.15B 187,800
2015 $5.58B 205,426
2016 $6.06B 215,401
2017 $6.55B 224,855
2018 $7.17B 202,717
2019 $7.18B 216,956
2020 $7.40B 203,988
2021 $7.62B 190,502
2022 $7.76B 189,807
2023 $8.39B 206,557
2024 $8.62B 229,028
2025 $8.66B 224,355
2026 $1.97B 70,066

Top Agencies

This section ranks federal agencies by total obligations under the current page filter.

Query Used

SELECT
     content__award__purchaserInformation__contractingOfficeAgencyID AS agency_id,
    anyHeavy(content__award__purchaserInformation__contractingOfficeAgencyID__name) AS agency_name,
    sum(content__award__dollarValues__obligatedAmount) AS total_obligated,
    count() AS award_count 
FROM
     fpds.data 
WHERE
     contract_type = 1
    AND content__award__competition__extentCompeted = 'G'
    AND content__award__relevantContractDates__signedDate != '' 
GROUP BY
     agency_id 
ORDER BY
     total_obligated DESC 
LIMIT  10

Explanation

This query aggregates federal contract awards that were not competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) by agency, focusing on contracts classified as direct awards without competition. Each row in the output table represents a single federal agency, identified by its unique agency code and name, along with the total dollar amount obligated and the count of awards issued under these non-competed SAP contracts. Analysts should interpret this section as a ranking of agencies by their financial commitment to non-competitive SAP awards, providing insight into which agencies rely most heavily on simplified acquisition methods without competition. This information supports market researchers and contractors in identifying key agencies with significant non-competitive procurement activity, informing strategic targeting and risk assessment. Additionally, it prompts follow-up questions about the reasons for limited competition within these agencies and potential opportunities for increased competitive sourcing or oversight.

# Agency ID Agency Name Total Obligated Award Count
1 2100 DEPT OF THE ARMY $14.22B 195,348
2 1700 DEPT OF THE NAVY $13.82B 356,918
3 97AS DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY $12.48B 609,253
4 3600 VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF $12.02B 1,947,018
5 5700 DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE $7.77B 87,071
6 7529 NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH $4.82B 81,533
7 1900 STATE, DEPARTMENT OF $2.99B 96,835
8 97AK DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY (DISA) $2.36B 25,787
9 8000 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION $2.13B 64,811
10 7008 U.S. COAST GUARD $1.96B 89,443

Top Vendors

This section ranks contractors by total obligations under the current page filter.

Query Used

SELECT
     content__award__vendor__vendorHeader__vendorName AS vendor_name,
    sum(content__award__dollarValues__obligatedAmount) AS total_obligated,
    count() AS award_count 
FROM
     fpds.data 
WHERE
     contract_type = 1
    AND content__award__competition__extentCompeted = 'G'
    AND content__award__relevantContractDates__signedDate != ''
    AND content__award__vendor__vendorHeader__vendorName IS NOT NULL
    AND content__award__vendor__vendorHeader__vendorName != '' 
GROUP BY
     vendor_name 
ORDER BY
     total_obligated DESC 
LIMIT  10

Explanation

This query identifies the top vendors receiving federal contract awards that were not competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), filtering specifically for contract type 1 and awards marked as “not competed.” Each row in the output table represents a single vendor, showing the total obligated amount awarded to that vendor and the count of awards they received within the filtered criteria. Analysts should interpret these results as a ranking of vendors by the dollar value of non-competitively awarded SAP contracts, highlighting those entities that dominate this segment of federal procurement. This section supports market research by revealing concentration patterns and potential reliance on specific vendors in non-competitive SAP awards. It also informs risk assessments and strategic sourcing decisions by identifying vendors with significant obligations that may warrant further scrutiny or engagement. Follow-up questions might include examining the nature of goods or services procured, agency distribution, or trends over time to better understand the drivers behind these non-competitive awards.

# Vendor Name Total Obligated Award Count
1 FREDERICK SAIC INC $1.98B 72
2 INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR, INC. $1.74B 2,875
3 BOEING COMPANY, THE $977.10M 38,995
4 NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION $865.77M 23,213
5 MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN CONTRACTORS $768.76M 27,637
6 FAMILY ENDEAVORS, INC. $717.07M 31
7 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. $629.20M 26,125
8 MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES $612.01M 43,230
9 SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION $536.14M 29,160
10 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION $535.17M 19,308

Raw KPI Values

Raw Total Obligated
$113,503,202,854.51
Raw Award Count
5,322,300
Raw Avg Award Size
$21,325.96
Raw Share Percent
0.00%

Overall Conclusion

Federal contracts awarded without competition under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) represent a substantial market segment, with total obligations exceeding $113.5 billion across more than 5.3 million awards. The average award size is relatively modest at approximately $21,300, reflecting the SAP’s role in facilitating streamlined, lower-dollar transactions. Spending is heavily concentrated within a handful of agencies, notably the Department of the Army, Department of the Navy, Defense Logistics Agency, Department of Veterans Affairs, and Department of the Air Force, which collectively account for the majority of obligations and award counts. Vendor concentration is notable but less extreme, with top contractors such as Frederick SAIC Inc. and Insight Public Sector, Inc. receiving multi-billion-dollar shares, yet the large number of awards suggests a broad vendor base participates in this procurement channel. Historical trends indicate that while early SAP obligations were minimal, the volume and value of awards have grown significantly over time, underscoring the increasing reliance on non-competitive simplified acquisitions. For analysts, this data highlights the importance of monitoring SAP awards to understand government spending patterns in lower-threshold procurements and to identify potential areas of vendor opportunity or risk. Contractors should recognize that while individual awards may be small, cumulative obligations through SAP represent a significant revenue stream, especially with key defense and veterans affairs agencies. Procurement researchers can use these insights to assess the balance between acquisition efficiency and competition, as well as to evaluate the implications of non-competitive awards on market dynamics and federal spending transparency.

Method Notes

This page is generated from a stored FPDS Query payload. The values shown here come from precomputed query blocks for KPI, share, yearly trend, top agencies, and top vendors.

Each analytical section can include the underlying query used together with an AI-generated explanation of what the result set represents and how it should be interpreted.

Use this page as a starting point for market structure review, then continue into deeper filtering and custom SQL in FPDS Query.

Use FPDS Query for deeper analysis

Move from this published page into full contract research with direct SQL access, broader filters, saved queries, and deeper procurement analysis across agencies, vendors, NAICS, PSC, and time windows.