NM leads this ranking at 1.19.
Geography
States with Fastest Growth
States with Fastest Growth shows which states rank highest by Growth in FPDS-based procurement data.
Analysis
NM leads this ranking at 1.19.
Why it matters: Use this page to identify leaders, compare major participants, and understand how activity is distributed across this segment of the federal market.
Methodology: The query groups FPDS records by the ranked entity, calculates the main metric, and orders results from highest to lowest. Supporting columns add context to the leaderboard.
Key Findings
- NM holds the top position.
- WY appears in the second position.
Limitations
- Interpretation depends on the SQL scope and selected filters.
- This page reflects only the returned query result set.
Query Used
-- States with Fastest Growth (YoY YTD by obligated amount)
SELECT
state_code,
total_current,
formatReadableQuantity(total_current) AS total_current_readable,
total_previous,
formatReadableQuantity(total_previous) AS total_previous_readable,
(total_current - total_previous) AS growth_absolute,
formatReadableQuantity(total_current - total_previous) AS growth_absolute_readable,
round((total_current / total_previous) - 1, 4) AS growth_rate
FROM
(
SELECT
content__award__placeOfPerformance__principalPlaceOfPerformance__stateCode AS state_code,
sumIf(
content__award__dollarValues__obligatedAmount,
toDate(parseDateTimeBestEffort(content__award__relevantContractDates__signedDate))
BETWEEN toStartOfYear(today()) AND today()
) AS total_current,
sumIf(
content__award__dollarValues__obligatedAmount,
toDate(parseDateTimeBestEffort(content__award__relevantContractDates__signedDate))
BETWEEN addYears(toStartOfYear(today()), -1) AND addYears(today(), -1)
) AS total_previous
FROM fpds.data
WHERE
contract_type = 1
AND content__award__placeOfPerformance__principalPlaceOfPerformance__stateCode IS NOT NULL
AND content__award__placeOfPerformance__principalPlaceOfPerformance__stateCode != ''
AND content__award__relevantContractDates__signedDate IS NOT NULL
GROUP BY state_code
)
WHERE
total_previous > 0
ORDER BY growth_rate DESC
LIMIT 100
Ranking Table
This table ranks results by Growth from highest to lowest.
| # | State Code | Total Current | Total Current Readable | Total Previous | Total Previous Readable | Growth Absolute | Growth Absolute Readable | Growth Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | 6849282272.1 | 6.85 billion | 3122390555.82 | 3.12 billion | 3726891716.28 | 3.73 billion | 1.19 |
| 2 | WY | 50560394.21 | 50.56 million | 28200909.72 | 28.20 million | 22359484.49 | 22.36 million | 0.79 |
| 3 | TX | 13848982480.18 | 13.85 billion | 8822313028.68 | 8.82 billion | 5026669451.5 | 5.03 billion | 0.56 |
| 4 | TN | 2684598060.68 | 2.68 billion | 2316873322.36 | 2.32 billion | 367724738.32 | 367.72 million | 0.15 |
| 5 | KS | 513729001.52 | 513.73 million | 461721623.09 | 461.72 million | 52007378.43 | 52.01 million | 0.11 |
| 6 | NV | 751498779.53 | 751.50 million | 768202920.37 | 768.20 million | -16704140.84 | -16.70 million | -0.03 |
| 7 | SC | 2047258170.65 | 2.05 billion | 2244229295.73 | 2.24 billion | -196971125.08 | -196.97 million | -0.09 |
| 8 | DC | 3865904183.35 | 3.87 billion | 5268486786.94 | 5.27 billion | -1402582603.59 | -1.40 billion | -0.27 |
| 9 | PR | 107534451.92 | 107.53 million | 146424062.42 | 146.42 million | -38889610.5 | -38.89 million | -0.27 |
| 10 | MT | 95922673.78 | 95.92 million | 137156521.92 | 137.16 million | -41233848.14 | -41.23 million | -0.31 |
| 11 | NE | 141269452.83 | 141.27 million | 261772684.65 | 261.77 million | -120503231.82 | -120.50 million | -0.47 |
| 12 | MI | 883586263.27 | 883.59 million | 1653158889.52 | 1.65 billion | -769572626.25 | -769.57 million | -0.47 |
| 13 | ND | 97278347.23 | 97.28 million | 185967858.55 | 185.97 million | -88689511.32 | -88.69 million | -0.48 |
| 14 | SD | 63685579.25 | 63.69 million | 122021349.87 | 122.02 million | -58335770.62 | -58.34 million | -0.48 |
| 15 | VA | 11577028039.54 | 11.58 billion | 23137596802.85 | 23.14 billion | -11560568763.31 | -11.56 billion | -0.50 |
| 16 | CA | 5626338837.39 | 5.63 billion | 11266093797.86 | 11.27 billion | -5639754960.47 | -5.64 billion | -0.51 |
| 17 | ID | 465993790.77 | 465.99 million | 943818022.24 | 943.82 million | -477824231.47 | -477.82 million | -0.51 |
| 18 | OR | 164288083.39 | 164.29 million | 346399579.03 | 346.40 million | -182111495.64 | -182.11 million | -0.53 |
| 19 | AK | 273809733.18 | 273.81 million | 611860614.37 | 611.86 million | -338050881.19 | -338.05 million | -0.56 |
| 20 | IL | 860990772.92 | 860.99 million | 1968815088.28 | 1.97 billion | -1107824315.36 | -1.11 billion | -0.57 |
| 21 | MD | 2903387493.63 | 2.90 billion | 6795219412.13 | 6.80 billion | -3891831918.5 | -3.89 billion | -0.58 |
| 22 | DE | 13741521.27 | 13.74 million | 32806328.4 | 32.81 million | -19064807.13 | -19.06 million | -0.59 |
| 23 | WV | 128417574.9 | 128.42 million | 319587105.02 | 319.59 million | -191169530.12 | -191.17 million | -0.60 |
| 24 | WA | 1115576349.7 | 1.12 billion | 2751143552.18 | 2.75 billion | -1635567202.48 | -1.64 billion | -0.60 |
| 25 | GA | 674401894.89 | 674.40 million | 1700554250.76 | 1.70 billion | -1026152355.87 | -1.03 billion | -0.61 |
| 26 | MO | 1336898753.87 | 1.34 billion | 3510705714.74 | 3.51 billion | -2173806960.87 | -2.17 billion | -0.62 |
| 27 | AR | 51557594.91 | 51.56 million | 137356629.45 | 137.36 million | -85799034.54 | -85.80 million | -0.63 |
| 28 | PA | 1770572945.22 | 1.77 billion | 4845184994.53 | 4.85 billion | -3074612049.31 | -3.07 billion | -0.64 |
| 29 | MA | 983138161.38 | 983.14 million | 2754528489.8 | 2.75 billion | -1771390328.42 | -1.77 billion | -0.65 |
| 30 | MN | 172560354.83 | 172.56 million | 537793432.05 | 537.79 million | -365233077.22 | -365.23 million | -0.68 |
| 31 | NY | 624119085.08 | 624.12 million | 2162098633.59 | 2.16 billion | -1537979548.51 | -1.54 billion | -0.72 |
| 32 | UT | 354195383.84 | 354.20 million | 1271816100.99 | 1.27 billion | -917620717.15 | -917.62 million | -0.73 |
| 33 | OK | 321665492.12 | 321.67 million | 1219081127.31 | 1.22 billion | -897415635.19 | -897.42 million | -0.74 |
| 34 | CO | 818253320.46 | 818.25 million | 3126006739.53 | 3.13 billion | -2307753419.07 | -2.31 billion | -0.74 |
| 35 | NJ | 450324429.04 | 450.32 million | 1740861235.62 | 1.74 billion | -1290536806.58 | -1.29 billion | -0.75 |
| 36 | AL | 607151065.05 | 607.15 million | 2712380422.45 | 2.71 billion | -2105229357.4 | -2.11 billion | -0.78 |
| 37 | VT | 27363415.37 | 27.36 million | 126703085.87 | 126.70 million | -99339670.5 | -99.34 million | -0.79 |
| 38 | NC | 332757031.21 | 332.76 million | 1611237562.12 | 1.61 billion | -1278480530.91 | -1.28 billion | -0.80 |
| 39 | MS | 139422013.56 | 139.42 million | 672193715.55 | 672.19 million | -532771701.99 | -532.77 million | -0.80 |
| 40 | IA | 97520284.39 | 97.52 million | 502827079.94 | 502.83 million | -405306795.55 | -405.31 million | -0.81 |
| 41 | OH | 407319628.7 | 407.32 million | 2205325167.35 | 2.21 billion | -1798005538.65 | -1.80 billion | -0.82 |
| 42 | FL | 1146319519.41 | 1.15 billion | 6376677580.16 | 6.38 billion | -5230358060.75 | -5.23 billion | -0.83 |
| 43 | AZ | 447762331.91 | 447.76 million | 2518748098.03 | 2.52 billion | -2070985766.12 | -2.07 billion | -0.83 |
| 44 | RI | 29816981.78 | 29.82 million | 182250361.87 | 182.25 million | -152433380.09 | -152.43 million | -0.84 |
| 45 | HI | 152930475.75 | 152.93 million | 1062670727.76 | 1.06 billion | -909740252.01 | -909.74 million | -0.86 |
| 46 | NH | 35558032.59 | 35.56 million | 423548031.13 | 423.55 million | -387989998.54 | -387.99 million | -0.92 |
| 47 | KY | 139973938.33 | 139.97 million | 1822734759.32 | 1.82 billion | -1682760820.99 | -1.68 billion | -0.93 |
| 48 | IN | 143236270.42 | 143.24 million | 1956968047.83 | 1.96 billion | -1813731777.41 | -1.81 billion | -0.93 |
| 49 | LA | 42391855.01 | 42.39 million | 580555719.23 | 580.56 million | -538163864.22 | -538.16 million | -0.93 |
| 50 | AS | 356320.66 | 356.32 thousand | 4767229.19 | 4.77 million | -4410908.53 | -4.41 million | -0.93 |
| 51 | WI | 61769276.91 | 61.77 million | 779293964.56 | 779.29 million | -717524687.65 | -717.52 million | -0.93 |
| 52 | ME | 13156995.3 | 13.16 million | 426554454.31 | 426.55 million | -413397459.01 | -413.40 million | -0.97 |
| 53 | MP | 117372.46 | 117.37 thousand | 3485494.02 | 3.49 million | -3368121.56 | -3.37 million | -0.97 |
| 54 | CT | 55840828.68 | 55.84 million | 4629850972.46 | 4.63 billion | -4574010143.78 | -4.57 billion | -0.99 |
| 55 | GU | 4509736.18 | 4.51 million | 642323063.04 | 642.32 million | -637813326.86 | -637.81 million | -1.00 |
How This Ranking Is Built
Build a ranked FPDS view for "States with Fastest Growth" using aggregated procurement data.
Query structure
- Results are sorted from highest to lowest by the main ranking metric.
- Grouping is used to combine FPDS records into comparable entity-level results.
Included fields
- state_code — Defines the ranked state or geography.
- growth_rate — Defines the main ranking metric: Growth.
- total_current — Adds supporting context to the leaderboard.
- total_previous — Adds supporting context to the leaderboard.
- growth_absolute — Adds supporting context to the leaderboard.
How to use this ranking
- Supports fast market review.
- Helps compare leaders and close competitors.
- Adds context beyond a raw transaction list.
Computed Metrics
Top Entities
| # | Entity | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | 1.19 |
| 2 | WY | 0.79 |
| 3 | TX | 0.56 |
| 4 | TN | 0.15 |
| 5 | KS | 0.11 |
| 6 | NV | -0.03 |
| 7 | SC | -0.09 |
| 8 | DC | -0.27 |
| 9 | PR | -0.27 |
| 10 | MT | -0.31 |
Related Pages
Use FPDS Query for deeper ranking analysis
Go beyond the published leaderboard with custom SQL, broader filters, saved queries, and deeper procurement market analysis across agencies, vendors, industries, PSC categories, and time windows.
Continue from this ranking into full FPDS Query workflows with deeper filtering, custom SQL, saved queries, and broader market comparison.