01 / Vendor Profile
DESIGN ALASKA, INC. Federal Contracts and Awards
UEI JK2NRCHYK4N6 · CAGE 0LEH4
Federal contract activity attributed to this vendor identity across FY 2019–FY 2025. Obligations are FPDS accounting transactions, not company revenue.
02 / Federal Business Size
Federal contract market at a glance
Measured consistently across FY 2019–FY 2025.
Across FY 2019–FY 2025, FPDS records attribute $21.72M in net contract obligations to DESIGN ALASKA, INC. across 243 contract actions. Net obligations include positive obligations and later deobligations recorded during the same period.
03 / Spending Trend
DESIGN ALASKA, INC. contract spending by year
Annual net obligations show whether recorded federal business expanded or contracted, while actions and customer counts show the breadth of that activity.
Total obligations$6.61M
FY 2025ObligationsHistorical spending range
| Fiscal year | Obligations | Actions | Federal customers | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2019 | $1.73M | 57 | 7 | — |
| FY 2020 | $1.67M | 27 | 6 | −3.5% |
| FY 2021 | $6.09M | 41 | 6 | +265.1% |
| FY 2022 | $1.83M | 36 | 5 | −69.9% |
| FY 2023 | $2.09M | 25 | 5 | +14.0% |
| FY 2024 | $1.69M | 27 | 4 | −19.1% |
| FY 2025 | $6.61M | 30 | 4 | +291.0% |
04 / Federal Customers
Which federal agencies buy from DESIGN ALASKA, INC.?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.
| Agency | Code | Obligations | Actions | Vendor share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5700 | $10.47M | 59 | 48.2% | |
| 1422 | $3.92M | 61 | 18.0% | |
| 1443 | $3.42M | 58 | 15.7% | |
| 2100 | $3.10M | 23 | 14.3% | |
| 7008 | $520.6K | 7 | 2.4% | |
| 1448 | $296.7K | 32 | 1.4% | |
| 6920 | -$4.6K | 3 | 0.0% |
05 / Contracting Offices
Which contracting offices buy from DESIGN ALASKA, INC.?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.
| Office | Code | Agency | Obligations | Actions | Vendor share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA5004 | DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE | $9.57M | 56 | 44.1% | |
| 140L06 | BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT | $3.92M | 61 | 18.0% | |
| W911KB | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $3.16M | 21 | 14.6% | |
| 140P20 | NATIONAL PARK SERVICE | $2.81M | 46 | 12.9% | |
| FA5000 | DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE | $898.3K | 3 | 4.1% | |
| 140P97 | NATIONAL PARK SERVICE | $614.8K | 12 | 2.8% | |
| 70Z087 | U.S. COAST GUARD | $520.6K | 7 | 2.4% | |
| 140F07 | U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE | $272.3K | 31 | 1.3% | |
| 140F03 | U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE | $24.4K | 1 | 0.1% | |
| W50S6K | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $2.5K | 1 | 0.0% |
06 / Top NAICS Industries
Which industries define this vendor’s federal work?
07 / Top Product and Service Codes
What products and services does the government buy from this vendor?
| PSC | Description | Obligations | Actions | Customers | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C219 | ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- GENERAL: OTHER | $10.90M | 72 | 4 | 50.2% |
| C211 | ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- GENERAL: LANDSCAPING, INTERIOR LAYOUT, AND DESIGNING | $8.51M | 125 | 6 | 39.2% |
| C1NB | ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- CONSTRUCTION: HEATING AND COOLING PLANTS | $1.48M | 2 | 1 | 6.8% |
| C1AA | ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- CONSTRUCTION: OFFICE BUILDINGS | $415.4K | 32 | 2 | 1.9% |
| C212 | ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- GENERAL: ENGINEERING DRAFTING, NOT CAD/CAM | $235.1K | 4 | 1 | 1.1% |
| C220 | ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- GENERAL: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING | $178.6K | 5 | 1 | 0.8% |
| C1BA | ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- CONSTRUCTION: AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWERS | -$4.6K | 3 | 1 | 0.0% |
08 / Competition Pattern
How was DESIGN ALASKA, INC.’s federal work competed?
Competition categories describe the procurement path recorded on the underlying contract actions.
09 / Recent Contract Awards
What contract actions were recorded most recently for DESIGN ALASKA, INC.?
The latest recorded PIIDs connect this profile to the underlying federal award search.
| Award / PIID | Signed | Obligation | Agency / office | NAICS | PSC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 140P2024F0445 | Sep 26, 2025 | $7.3K | NATIONAL PARK SERVICE DSC CONTRACTING SERVICES DIVISION | 541330 | C211 |
10 / Interpreting the Profile
How should you evaluate DESIGN ALASKA, INC. as a federal contractor?
Read obligations, customers, markets, competition, and individual awards together. A large historical total indicates federal scale, but it does not by itself describe current backlog, commercial revenue, profitability, or future opportunity.
Separate obligations from revenue
FPDS obligations are government accounting actions and may include later deobligations.
Follow customer concentration
Agency and office concentration reveals where the vendor’s federal relationships are strongest.
Test market overlap
NAICS and PSC shares show whether the vendor competes in the same markets as your company.
Inspect the awards
Open the PIIDs to verify dates, offices, classifications, and transaction history.