GETWAB

02 / Federal Business Size

Federal contract market at a glance

Measured consistently across FY 2019–FY 2025.

Net obligations$36.09M
Contract actions290
Awards / PIIDs74
Federal customers3
Contracting offices10
Average action$124.5K
Active fiscal years7
Data coverageFY 2019–FY 2025

Across FY 2019–FY 2025, FPDS records attribute $36.09M in net contract obligations to TECTONICS across 290 contract actions. Net obligations include positive obligations and later deobligations recorded during the same period.

03 / Spending Trend

TECTONICS contract spending by year

Annual net obligations show whether recorded federal business expanded or contracted, while actions and customer counts show the breadth of that activity.

Total obligations$5.70M
FY 2025
ObligationsHistorical spending range
Fiscal yearObligationsActionsFederal customersChange
FY 2019$2.27M482
FY 2020$2.07M422−8.8%
FY 2021$3.19M292+53.8%
FY 2022$3.62M453+13.5%
FY 2023$12.37M423+241.4%
FY 2024$6.87M433−44.4%
FY 2025$5.70M413−17.1%

04 / Federal Customers

Which federal agencies buy from TECTONICS?

Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.

AgencyCodeObligationsActionsVendor share
1700$28.27M8378.3%
4740$7.22M19320.0%
12H2$603.4K141.7%

05 / Contracting Offices

Which contracting offices buy from TECTONICS?

Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.

06 / Top NAICS Industries

Which industries define this vendor’s federal work?

NAICSDescriptionObligationsActionsCustomersShare
541310ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES$36.09M2903100.0%

07 / Top Product and Service Codes

What products and services does the government buy from this vendor?

PSCDescriptionObligationsActionsCustomersShare
C1AAARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- CONSTRUCTION: OFFICE BUILDINGS$10.37M96228.7%
C211ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- GENERAL: LANDSCAPING, INTERIOR LAYOUT, AND DESIGNING$7.91M36221.9%
C219ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- GENERAL: OTHER$7.05M31219.5%
C215ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- GENERAL: PRODUCTION ENGINEERING$2.85M9727.9%
C1FCARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- CONSTRUCTION: TROOP HOUSING FACILITIES$2.20M216.1%
C1AZARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- CONSTRUCTION: OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES/SERVICE BUILDINGS$1.48M824.1%
C216ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- GENERAL: MARINE ENGINEERING$1.35M513.7%
C1NAARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- CONSTRUCTION: FUEL SUPPLY FACILITIES$1.17M713.2%
C1JZARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- CONSTRUCTION: MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS$960.4K112.7%
C1GAARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- CONSTRUCTION: AMMUNITION STORAGE BUILDINGS$303.9K110.8%

08 / Competition Pattern

How was TECTONICS’s federal work competed?

Competition categories describe the procurement path recorded on the underlying contract actions.

Competition categoryObligationsActions
Not competed under SAP$36.05M287
Competed$41.5K3

09 / Recent Contract Awards

What contract actions were recorded most recently for TECTONICS?

The latest recorded PIIDs connect this profile to the underlying federal award search.

Award / PIIDSignedObligationAgency / officeNAICSPSC
47PK0120F0019Sep 30, 2025$0PUBLIC BUILDINGS SERVICE PBS R9 AMD CAPITAL PROJECTS541310C1AA

10 / Interpreting the Profile

How should you evaluate TECTONICS as a federal contractor?

Read obligations, customers, markets, competition, and individual awards together. A large historical total indicates federal scale, but it does not by itself describe current backlog, commercial revenue, profitability, or future opportunity.

01

Separate obligations from revenue

FPDS obligations are government accounting actions and may include later deobligations.

02

Follow customer concentration

Agency and office concentration reveals where the vendor’s federal relationships are strongest.

03

Test market overlap

NAICS and PSC shares show whether the vendor competes in the same markets as your company.

04

Inspect the awards

Open the PIIDs to verify dates, offices, classifications, and transaction history.