GETWAB

02 / Federal Business Size

Federal contract market at a glance

Measured consistently across FY 2019–FY 2025.

Net obligations$81.50M
Contract actions141
Awards / PIIDs30
Federal customers1
Contracting offices7
Average action$578.0K
Active fiscal years7
Data coverageFY 2019–FY 2025

Across FY 2019–FY 2025, FPDS records attribute $81.50M in net contract obligations to RLF AND SHERLOCK SMITH AND ADAMS JV across 141 contract actions. Net obligations include positive obligations and later deobligations recorded during the same period.

03 / Spending Trend

RLF AND SHERLOCK SMITH AND ADAMS JV contract spending by year

Annual net obligations show whether recorded federal business expanded or contracted, while actions and customer counts show the breadth of that activity.

Total obligations$3.94M
FY 2025
ObligationsHistorical spending range
Fiscal yearObligationsActionsFederal customersChange
FY 2019$227.0K41
FY 2020$22.32M251+9,731.9%
FY 2021$18.58M221−16.7%
FY 2022$20.36M231+9.6%
FY 2023$4.92M231−75.9%
FY 2024$11.16M281+126.9%
FY 2025$3.94M161−64.7%

04 / Federal Customers

Which federal agencies buy from RLF AND SHERLOCK SMITH AND ADAMS JV?

Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.

AgencyCodeObligationsActionsVendor share
1700$81.50M141100.0%

05 / Contracting Offices

Which contracting offices buy from RLF AND SHERLOCK SMITH AND ADAMS JV?

Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.

OfficeCodeAgencyObligationsActionsVendor share
N62473DEPT OF THE NAVY$35.31M8243.3%
N40084DEPT OF THE NAVY$17.12M621.0%
N69450DEPT OF THE NAVY$12.05M1814.8%
N40085DEPT OF THE NAVY$9.33M2111.5%
N44255DEPT OF THE NAVY$5.04M56.2%
N62742DEPT OF THE NAVY$2.66M43.3%
N62470DEPT OF THE NAVY$5.0K50.0%

06 / Top NAICS Industries

Which industries define this vendor’s federal work?

NAICSDescriptionObligationsActionsCustomersShare
541310ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES$81.50M1411100.0%

07 / Top Product and Service Codes

What products and services does the government buy from this vendor?

PSCDescriptionObligationsActionsCustomersShare
C211ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- GENERAL: LANDSCAPING, INTERIOR LAYOUT, AND DESIGNING$47.60M73158.4%
C1DZARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- CONSTRUCTION: OTHER HOSPITAL BUILDINGS$15.72M33119.3%
C219ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- GENERAL: OTHER$9.00M19111.0%
C1DAARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- CONSTRUCTION: HOSPITALS AND INFIRMARIES$5.04M516.2%
C1DBARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- CONSTRUCTION: LABORATORIES AND CLINICS$4.16M1115.1%

08 / Competition Pattern

How was RLF AND SHERLOCK SMITH AND ADAMS JV’s federal work competed?

Competition categories describe the procurement path recorded on the underlying contract actions.

Competition categoryObligationsActions
Competed$81.50M141

09 / Recent Contract Awards

What contract actions were recorded most recently for RLF AND SHERLOCK SMITH AND ADAMS JV?

The latest recorded PIIDs connect this profile to the underlying federal award search.

Award / PIIDSignedObligationAgency / officeNAICSPSC
N6247321F4005Sep 19, 2025$0DEPT OF THE NAVY NAVFACSYSCOM SOUTHWEST541310C1DB

10 / Interpreting the Profile

How should you evaluate RLF AND SHERLOCK SMITH AND ADAMS JV as a federal contractor?

Read obligations, customers, markets, competition, and individual awards together. A large historical total indicates federal scale, but it does not by itself describe current backlog, commercial revenue, profitability, or future opportunity.

01

Separate obligations from revenue

FPDS obligations are government accounting actions and may include later deobligations.

02

Follow customer concentration

Agency and office concentration reveals where the vendor’s federal relationships are strongest.

03

Test market overlap

NAICS and PSC shares show whether the vendor competes in the same markets as your company.

04

Inspect the awards

Open the PIIDs to verify dates, offices, classifications, and transaction history.