GETWAB

01 / Contracting Office Profile

Commander Federal Contracts and Spending

Office code M00264

Commander is a federal contracting office within DEPT OF THE NAVY. This profile shows the office’s purchasing scale, incumbent vendors, market classifications, competition, and recent contract activity.

02 / Market Size

Commander contract market at a glance

Net obligations, purchasing activity, and supplier participation measured consistently across FY 2019–FY 2025.

Total obligations$1.42B
Contract actions6,660
Vendors1,092
Parent agencyDEPT OF THE NAVY
Parent departmentDEPT OF DEFENSE
Average action value$212.9K
Parent agency share0.1%
Data coverage FY 2019–2025

Across FY 2019–FY 2025, Commander accounts for 0.1% of its parent agency’s net contract obligations. Net obligations include positive obligations and later deobligations recorded during the same period.

03 / Spending Trend

Commander contract spending by year

Annual net obligations for FY 2019–FY 2025 show whether the office’s recorded contract market is growing or contracting. Actions and vendors indicate whether that change reflects broader purchasing activity or a smaller number of large transactions.

Total obligations$192.06M
FY 2025
ObligationsHistorical spending range
Fiscal yearObligationsActionsVendorsChange
FY 2025$192.06M739302−12.7%
FY 2024$219.92M856342+11.1%
FY 2023$197.98M930369+13.1%
FY 2022$175.01M878358−12.6%
FY 2021$200.15M1,053409+14.0%
FY 2020$175.50M1,001409−31.9%
FY 2019$257.61M1,203437

04 / Buying Hierarchy

Where does Commander sit in the federal buying structure?

The office executes procurement within a contracting agency, which belongs to a federal department. Follow either profile to compare this office with the broader organizations directing and funding its activity.

Organization levelOrganizationCodeExplore
Contracting agencyDEPT OF THE NAVY1700View agency profile
Federal departmentDEPT OF DEFENSE9700View department profile

05 / Top NAICS Industries

Which industries receive the most Commander contract spending?

NAICS industries ranked by recorded obligations show where this office’s contract demand is concentrated and how many actions and vendors participate in each market.

NAICSDescriptionObligationsActionsVendorsOffice share
541330ENGINEERING SERVICES$230.42M2943116.2%
541512COMPUTER SYSTEMS DESIGN SERVICES$187.05M1592913.2%
541611ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES$185.09M3824113.1%
541519OTHER COMPUTER RELATED SERVICES$103.64M1,0311537.3%
541810ADVERTISING AGENCIES$90.01M2136.3%
611699ALL OTHER MISCELLANEOUS SCHOOLS AND INSTRUCTION$85.33M60146.0%
624190OTHER INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES$61.67M4234.3%
541511CUSTOM COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES$49.91M108273.5%
611519OTHER TECHNICAL AND TRADE SCHOOLS$41.52M12652.9%
611710EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES$37.80M235212.7%

06 / Top Product and Service Codes

What products and services does Commander buy?

Product and Service Codes ranked by recorded obligations show the specific categories purchased by this office.

PSCDescriptionObligationsActionsVendorsOffice share
R499SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: OTHER$243.83M6199817.2%
R699SUPPORT- ADMINISTRATIVE: OTHER$127.43M107189.0%
R425SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL$96.91M128256.8%
T001PHOTO/MAP/PRINT/PUBLICATION- ARTS/GRAPHICS$90.61M1956.4%
U009EDUCATION/TRAINING- GENERAL$76.23M161205.4%
R408SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT$64.69M108174.6%
U002EDUCATION/TRAINING- PERSONNEL TESTING$58.60M714.1%
G099SOCIAL- OTHER$56.10M3124.0%
7A21IT AND TELECOM - BUSINESS APPLICATION SOFTWARE (PERPETUAL LICENSE SOFTWARE)$49.94M5171033.5%
DA01IT AND TELECOM - BUSINESS APPLICATION/APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (LABOR)$40.96M136222.9%

07 / Top Vendors

Which contractors receive the most Commander obligations?

Vendors are ranked by recorded obligations to show the office’s leading incumbents, their share of spending, purchasing activity, and primary NAICS and PSC markets.

VendorObligationsAwards / actionsSharePrimary NAICS / PSC
J. WALTER THOMPSON U.S.A., LLC$89.81M146.3%NAICS 541810 · PSC T001
ECS FEDERAL, LLC$75.55M335.3%NAICS 541511 · PSC R499
LEIDOS, INC.$61.13M144.3%NAICS 541330 · PSC R699
DAVIS DEFENSE GROUP, INC.$58.57M84.1%NAICS 541330 · PSC U002
KATMAI INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS, LLC$56.78M364.0%NAICS 541611 · PSC R699
II CORPS CONSULTANTS, INC.$47.71M1963.4%NAICS 541330 · PSC U008
CORPS SOLUTIONS LLC$45.96M1583.2%NAICS 541614 · PSC R702
GROUP W INC.$40.73M1612.9%NAICS 541611 · PSC B599
COMPLETE PARACHUTE SOLUTIONS, INC.$39.19M122.8%NAICS 611699 · PSC U009
T. A. CONSULTING, INC$37.27M242.6%NAICS 624190 · PSC G099

08 / Buying Pattern

How does Commander award contract work?

Competition, small-business participation, set-asides, transaction size, and action types provide a compact view of how the office structures its recorded contract activity.

Competition rate 92.1% Small-business share 11.0% Set-aside share 52.8% Average action value $212.9K Largest recorded action $92.31M
Contract action typeActionsShare of actions
Delivery Order3,74356.2%
Purchase Order2,05830.9%
Definitive Contract4737.1%
BPA Call3865.8%

09 / Recent Contract Awards

What did Commander award most recently in FY 2019–FY 2025?

The latest recorded contract actions inside this profile’s closed fiscal-year window connect award activity with the vendors, markets, agencies, and offices shown above.

10 / Interpreting the Profile

What does this contract market mean for a supplier?

This profile combines spending scale, the buying hierarchy, incumbent vendors, market classifications, and competition indicators. Read them together before deciding whether Commander represents an addressable market for your company.

01

Read spending in context

$1.42B in recorded obligations describes historical market scale. Compare it with 6,660 contract actions and an average action value of $212.9K to understand purchasing frequency and transaction size.

02

Follow the actual buyers

This office sits within DEPT OF THE NAVY and DEPT OF DEFENSE. Use that hierarchy to understand who directs its mission and how its purchasing compares with the broader organization.

03

Do not confuse scale with access

A large historical total does not mean the same amount is currently open for competition. Use the 92.1% competition rate, set-aside share, recent awards, and current opportunities to estimate what may actually be addressable.

04

Test market fit and incumbency

Compare leading vendors with NAICS 541330 and PSC R499. Supplier concentration and competition reveal whether demand aligns with your capabilities and how difficult displacement may be.